Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Phillip Menkel" <pmenkel@***.edu>
Subject: Re: Otakus
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 18:00:03 -0500 (CDT)
> On Wed, 7 Aug 1996, mr. self-destruct wrote:
>
parts have been snipted
> > Hoi everybody!
> >
> > before, but what do you all think about the Otaku rules in VR2.0?
> > I mean, they're described as a sort of "decking gods", but if you use
the
> > character generation system in VR2.0, all you get is a slightly above average
> > decker whose main advantages are that he does not use a deck at all and
therefore
> > has not to care about SOTA.
> > 1st, you have no memory. What is a decker worth if he cannot download any
> > paydata? Course you can solve that problem by adding cyberware, but you
certainly
> > cannot afford that at character generation.
> > 2nd, the complex forms. You can only simulate operational utilities, so there's
> > no sleaze (-> rather bad detection factor) no shield and certainly no attack
> > program.
> > The only solution I found is not allowing Otakus as player characters, which I
do
> > not want, because they are just too, well, not cool, but interesting.
> > So what houserules (if any) do you guys use? I already have some ideas, but I
1st
> > wanna hear what other people have.
>

???????????????/

Here is my problem. Where does he get the 22 points from in the VR2.0
book to spend on complex forms? I would like to know soon. I am planning
on playing a decker soon and was wanting to play a Otakus this time
instead.
> Simple Otakus have 22 points to spend on complex forms which after the
> almost mandatory 6 for sleaze leaves them with 16 points to play around
> with (I've added to this a rule that players can't start out with black
> hammer programs).
>
> Stephen
> Austin, TX


--
**********************************************************
* Phillip Menkel Student Operator *
* pmenkel@***.edu Helpdesk Student *
* 1700 Ashwood Apt.#3 Computer Services-UMR *
* Rolla, MO 65401 *
* (573) 368-3946 Dept. of Civil Enginerring *
* (573) 368-3947 University of Missouri@***** *
******************Geek Code: Version 3.1******************
* GE/CM/CS/O d- s+:- a-- c++$ UHL+$>+++ P+>+++ L+>+++ E? *
* W++(+) N++ o? K? w+(+++)>+++ O- M-- V? PS+ PE+ Y+(++) *
* PGP+ t+(++) 5- x R+(++) tv+ b+(++++) DI++ D++ G e>++$ *
* h->--- r++>+++ y+ z+>+++ *
**********************************************************

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.