Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: chaos@*****.com (Steven Ratkovich)
Subject: Re: Screwing the players
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 07:52:35 -0500 (EST)
>Pete wrote:
>
>>This is only safe to assume, if they are on a casual visit, but let's
>>face it, how often do you see the hero in a movie, get out of his car,
>>and lock it.... No often, in fact almost never. Also, if there is a
>>situation developing, and the players bin out of the car, ready to run,
>>or act. There is also a debate as to whether they lock the vehicle.
>>The worst mistake a GM can make is to assume anything about the
>>players, it *will* get thrown back at him/her.
>
>Then lay down your default assumptions at the start of the campaign.
>These defaults apply in any cases where the player doesn't outline his
>actions clearly. make sure your players understand this.
>
>Examples of my defaults:
>Weapons are always concealed except on a run.
>Characters always lock & activate vehicle security systems
>Ammo & weapons normally carried by players are specified on their
>character sheet, otherwise they use their normally used handgun with
>regular ammo.
>Characters always use their SIN for payment (some characters already
>have their laundering systems set up by default.
>
>There's a fairly comprehensive list, with individual varitaions for
>certain people.
>
>
>
We do something similar. I have them each write their defaults down for me,
so that way I have it in THEIR handwriting... They have to specifically
tell me whenthey want to do something differently...:)


#######################################################
# -Bull, aka Chaos, aka Rak, aka Steven Ratkovich #
# chaos@*****.com #
# Order is Illusion! Chaos is Bliss! Got any fours? #
#######################################################

"You do more damage out of simple irritation than most
men can do in a towering rage."
-David Eddings, "Demon Lord of Karanda

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.