Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl>
Subject: Re: ShadowRN T-Shirts, anyone?
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 13:22:53 +0100
Faux Pas said on 21:29/23 Sep 96...

> I'll volunteer to organize the whole thing again, having seen what I got
> myself into last April/May. This time, I'm thinking another black (or dark
> colored) shirt: on front either a four-color design or a simulated 4c
> process on black; on back, a list of everyone's names (and e-mail addresses,
> space permitting) printed over the stylized "S" logo found in the word
> "Shadowrun" on the front of the main rule book.

If this gets done, I think the back should look better than it did on the
last shirt -- leave off the email addresses if it means the back won't be
as bare as it was last spring.
Also, a higher-quality shirt (not the prints, the shirt) would be
desirable -- my 1994 and 1995 shirts are still going (more or less)
strong, while the 1996 shirt has shrunk terribly.

> Right now, this is just a call to see if anyone is interested in getting a
> t-shirt. If enough people want one, I'll go ahead and get more information
> out and officially say I'm organizing a t-shirt for the mailing list.

To tell the truth, I think one shirt a year is enough, each spring/summer
(northern hemisphere, that is) or so.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Don't ask me to justify my life.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.