Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: chaos@*****.com (Steven Ratkovich)
Subject: Re: PC's Morality
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 20:49:52 -0500 (EST)
>I recently started a campaign, after being away from the game for
>about a year (not by choice mine you). And the PC's were indirectly
>involved with the death of 149 "innocent" children being held
>in a corp facility. Mind you the corp is offering a reward for any
>information leading to the capture of said PCs, whom they had a
>relatively good video of. I asked the players if they felt any
>remorse whatsoever about the deaths. And they said "No." My
>question is should I as a GM make their lives a living hell? I mean
>being somewhat resposible for the deaths of a 149 children, wouldn't
>it ruin their street reputations for getting jobs? What would you
>other GM's do, if this type of situation came up in your campaign?
>Curios,
>

OH, yeah. This is just begging you, as teh wonderful and benign GM that you
are, to make their lives a living HELL, and I say you have evry reason to.
Even in the Shadowrun world, where morals aren't exactly the most popular
trait for a runner to have, only the most ruthless, cold-hearted bastards
would view the death of 149 children that lightly. Have the corp offer a
LARGE bounty on the characters, dead or alive, and have evryone, including
contacts and friends trying to turn them in. This, if nothing else, will
teach them a little compassion for innocents, or at least not to kill in the
interest of self preservation...


#######################################################
# -Bull, aka Chaos, aka Rak, aka Steven Ratkovich #
# chaos@*****.com #
# Order is Illusion! Chaos is Bliss! Got any fours? #
#######################################################

"You do more damage out of simple irritation than most
men can do in a towering rage."
-David Eddings, "Demon Lord of Karanda

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.