From: | Loki <loki@*******.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Kyle Morgan |
Date: | Tue, 24 Sep 1996 23:31:22 -0700 |
>
> Loki wrote:
> |
> |David Buehrer wrote:
> |>
> |> Loki wrote:
> |> |
> |> |You refer to Perianwyr as Kyle's "pet"?
> |>
> |> "Pet" was easier to type than "Perianwyr". And, I didn't
> |> want to give to much away for any unscrupulous players
> |> reading the post.
> |
> |Then why not "Per"? You did type out "Kyle's little pet" (17
characters)
> |rather than "Perianwyr" (9 characters). Guess dragons are a little
> |different in your game than mine. I would't even play someone like Kyle
> |cocky enough to call Perianwyr his "pet." Not to mention that really
> |under-mines the long standing friendship and empathic-bond they share
> |doesn't it? But that's just IMHO.
>
> This is not a flame.
>
> Okay... the point of my story was to illustrate that Kyle
> and Perianwyr lost to *one* moderately powered PC mage due
> to really lowsy GM dice roles. I know that Kyle and
> Perianwyr are friends and that Per is *not* Kyle's pet. My
> players, however, didn't see it that way. It's a case of
> me not taking time to explain the reference (cuz I didn't
> think it was that important, sorry) while trying to be
> humorous. I didn't realize that you were taking it so
> seriously.
>
> -David
My comment(s) haven't been meant as flames either. Dragons are just a
thing with me, and I thought it peculiar to have seen one referred to in
that sense. Especially sense this particular one is growing to be a
major NPC. No harm meant, hope none was done. :o)
@>-,--'--- Loki
CLARKE'S THIRD LAW:
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
*********************************************
Poisoned Elves
http://www.netzone.com/~loki/
*********************************************