Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: dbuehrer@****.org (David Buehrer)
Subject: Re: PC's Morality
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 06:50:18 -0600 (MDT)
Brennan M. O'Keefe wrote:
|
|> From: Sedah Drol <sedahdro@****.holli.com>
|
|> I recently started a campaign, after being away from the game for
|> about a year (not by choice mine you). And the PC's were indirectly
|> involved with the death of 149 "innocent" children being held
|> in a corp facility. Mind you the corp is offering a reward for any
|> information leading to the capture of said PCs, whom they had a
|> relatively good video of. I asked the players if they felt any
|> remorse whatsoever about the deaths. And they said "No." My
|> question is should I as a GM make their lives a living hell? I mean
|> being somewhat resposible for the deaths of a 149 children, wouldn't
|> it ruin their street reputations for getting jobs? What would you
|> other GM's do, if this type of situation came up in your campaign?
|
|My first idea can be summed up in two words: Vengeful Spirits. After all,
|there are ghosts in Shadowrun, as well as all kinds of nasty things which
|could possibly be called forth by that much pain and suffering. Could the
|death agonies have created a sort of toxic domain? Could a child's
|"invisible friend" have been a free spirit? For that matter, some types of
|evil spirits might take more of an interest in the characters. Or maybe
|something more corporeal wants revenge: parents, friends, etc.

Or maybe something wants to go along for the ride, like a
Wraith. <heh, heh, heh>

-David

/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\ dbuehrer@****.org /^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\
"His thoughts tumbled in his head, making and breaking
alliances like underpants in a dryer without Cling Free."
~~~http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm~~~~

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.