Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Sascha Pabst" <Sascha.Pabst@**********.Uni-Oldenburg.DE>
Subject: Re: Was GM fair? WAS:Asbestos suit ready....
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 06:41:14 +0000
On 25 Sep 96 at 15:13, The Digital Mage wrote:
> Now correct me if I'm wrong but when you ground a spell out through a
> spell lock, or such like, to also affect other targets within teh area
> of effect you have to have LOS to them. Therefore in your example teh
> physical component of teh spell lock would have been toast, as teh spell
> grounded out into it, but the mage would be okay as teh elf didn't have
> LOS.
That's partly right. You have to have LOS to the spell lock, and you have to
have LOS to all targets within range of the (combat-) spell to affect 'em. If
one's hidden, you can't affect him.

But as was said earlier, until the attacking magician had LOS to the spell
lock, he couldn't have cast a spell at it. Would he have been able to see the
magician, he could have shot/toasted him in any case. Were he astral
projecting, his meat body could not have been moving. Were he just perceiving,
he'd had LOS even when not perceiving (see above).

The GM has really botched this one, if all was as Tim explained.

Sascha
--
+---___---------+----------------------------------------+--------------------+
| / / _______ | Jhary-a-Conel aka Sascha Pabst |The one who does not|
| / /_/ ____/ |Sascha.Pabst@**********.Uni-Oldenburg.de| learn from history |
| \___ __/ | | is bound to live |
|==== \_/ ======| *Wearing hats is just a way of life* | through it again. |
|LOGOUT FASCISM!| - Me | G. Santayana |
+------------- http://www.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de/~jhary -----------------+

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.