Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <loki@*******.com>
Subject: Re: Stealth -Reply
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 22:50:24 -0700
Jeffrey Riordan wrote:
>
> >>> dreamwvr <dreamwvr@******.co.za> 09/25/96
> 10:04am >>>
> I was wondering how other groups do Stealth tests.
> There are 2 methods I use and I haven't chosen one in
> particular, yet.
>
> 1) Opposed Test: Character rolls stealth vs TN 4(+ adj)
> and NPC rolls perception against TN 4 (+adj).
>
> 2) Non-opposed test: PC rolls stealth vs TN 4 (+mods).
> Every success raises the NPC's detection TN (4) by
> +1.
>
> Any comments? Pro's and Cons etc . . .
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> I use method number 2 since that is how most of
> the other effects of things like Invisability and Spirit
> concealment add to things. It also makes Stealth a
> worthwhile skill to buy even after character creation
> because if you use method number 1 you'll need
> about skill 4 to beat average intelligence people.
> It also keeps with the Perception table in the main
> book regarding success tests on perception. 1
> Success = noticing something is up, 2-3 general
> information, 4 + more specific info.

Again I agree with the Option 2 for the reasons described above.
Otherwise it never made sense to me why FASA would give archetypes and
NPC's they designed a Stealth of 1 or 2...

Option one would laugh at a Stealth of 1 when trying to sneak past a
security guard with Intelligence of 3 or 4.


@>-,--'--- Loki

CLARKE'S THIRD LAW:
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

*********************************************
Poisoned Elves
http://www.netzone.com/~loki/
*********************************************

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.