Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Caric" <caric@*******.com>
Subject: Re: Watchers (was Re: Re[2]: Bugs [p])
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 12:11:49 -0700
----------
> From: Steven Ratkovich <chaos@*****.com>
> To: shadowrn@********.itribe.net
> Subject: Re: Watchers (was Re: Re[2]: Bugs [p])
> Date: Thursday, September 26, 1996 10:57 AM
>
> >> In our campiagn, the watchers are blobs (usually...), spirits always
have a
> >> distinct personality, usually based on whatever we had watched that
week,
> >> And elementals have no personality to start, but the more you use a
> >> particular one, and the longer you keep it in service, it develops a
> >> personality...:)
> >
> >Ask Caric about Squib, he was a watcher his Dog Shaman summoned one time
> >with the simple command of distracting and annoying the bad guys during
> >one encounter (to give them modifiers). Squib appeared as a ball of blue
> >and yellow yarn with two eyestalks and bright red tennis shoes. The
> >encounter was a bar fight, so squib bounded down the bar to the nearest
> >baddy and eagerly launched into a loud expose of the rules for the
> >Rumbly Games on the Meta-plane of Wet, I believe the baddy was
> >unconcious by the time Squib had gotten to re-iterating the importance
> >of Bonus Fricks...
> >
> ROTFL!!!!:)
>
> Sounds like a watcher my characters daughter summoned up once. It
showed
> up as a yellow smiley face with little tennis shoes...:)
>
> >Any way Squib was so much fun, whenever it came to conjuring a watcher
> >Caric would usually try to bring him back. (BTW Caric, did we ever go
> >over the fact that a watcher is supposed to be an extension of your own
> >consciousness???)
> > @>-,--'--- Loki
> >
> Ya know Loki, between Caric and Rookie, sounds like you got an
interesting
> group...:)
>
Thanks for the compliment Steve, but you don't know the half of it.

nudge, nudge, wink, wink, know what I mean know what I mean


:p~~


Caric

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.