From:	Online Computer <onlcomp@***.net>
Subject:	Re: Re[2]: Decking Dangers
Date:	Thu, 26 Sep 1996 22:40:41 GMT

At 15:39 26.09.1996 EST, you wrote:
>
>
>______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
>
>
>On 25 Sep 96 at 18:31, Steven Ratkovich wrote:
>> Seriously, Mark, even with all the little nasties taht the GM can throw at
>> me, a rating 10D area damage spell with 8 points of suppression, compunded
>> with 12 dice in decking and something like 5d6+22 initiative, and it's not
>> so much a matter of the IC hitting me as the IC getting a chance to go. On
>> top of that, He has a rating 10 armor, and shield prog, and a 9 bod, I
>> believe.
>%Hm, may I suggest to your GM to use the (optional) Bandwidth Rules (VR2,
>%pp.90-91) and the Bandwidth from the Jackpoints (VR2, p.28) ?
>%Might make you fear the matrix again... Rating 10 Attack + rating 10 Shield +
>%(4*9 = 36) Rating points persona programs (assumed) even break the limit of a
>%workstation. And you still have no sleaze or anything else... Uh-oh. :-)
>
> %Sascha
>
>YES! I knew I was overlooking something.....
>Thx sascha.
>but I still thing there should be a limit on hardening.
> Ferri
>
I think you could bring him in more serious problems with tracer ICE. His
hardening
will not work against a couple of Corporate goons...

Fleymen