Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: The Digital Mage <mn3rge@****.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Security Tally
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 18:00:42 +0100 (BST)
On Fri, 27 Sep 1996, David Buehrer wrote:

> |Well, they way I remember it was
I guess that memory ain't so good :)

> I can't believe I'm going to do this but...
>
> pg 29, "For example, if a decker logs on to UCAS-SEA-2206
> and incurs a tally of 2, then logs on to the UCAS-SEA RTG
> central system and picks up another point to his tally,
> then finally accesses UCAS-SEA-4206 and picks up another 2
> points, his Security Tally stands at 5 and stays at 5 for
> as long as he is logged on to the UCAS-SEA grids.
I think this is where my misinterpretation came in, I see it as you're
logging off the RTG/LTg when you access a private Host, be it on a PLTG or
not.

> pg 29, "Because PLTGs maintain very active security
> routines, a security tally built up under a given RTG does
> remain in force if the decker logs on to a PLTG from the
> RTG." (Which I interpret as also refering to logging on to
> a PLTG from an LTG within the RTG.)
Now this I obviously didn't remember :)

> DM, this is not meant as a slam.
'Twasn't taken as one, I'm not easy to rile :)

I think I still might use my view of it though, it seems to make more
sense to me, and gives starting deckers a chance, otherwoise their sec
tally will likely be at 5+ when they simply log on to a private host
(logging onto LTG, searching for LTG number, then logging onto host) and
thus they will automatically trigger some form of IC, likely Probe which
effectively double the speed at which teh tally incraeses :(

The Digital Mage : mn3rge@****.ac.uk
"Life is a choice, Death....an obligation."-Me
Shadowrun WWW site at http://www.bath.ac.uk/~mn3rge/Shadowrun

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.