Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Brian W Allison <ballison@*******.WAM.UMD.EDU>
Subject: Re: New SR E-mag
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 18:00:28 -0500
On Mon, 2 Dec 1996, Gurth wrote:

> > He made his decision - based on Gurth's advice "Because Gurth has done
> > this before" - about 24 hours ago.
>
> You can't deny that I have some experience in formatting stuff in a word
> processor; if Fro thinks that makes my comments advice to be listened to,

I certainly can deny that you are without - in my evaluation -
sufficient breadth and depth of experience using computers in general to
made recommendations to me as if they're fact.

In fact, I do so *now*.

And of course you'll not attempt to dissuade *anyone* from taking your
advice with weight. That'd be against your best interests.

> then I'm not going to stop him. In the end, it all comes down to what Fro
> thinks is the best way to deal with this, whether he bases his decision

Exactly. I first said that about.... 20 hours ago (as of this writing.).

You're behind SOTA.

> My position on this and most anything else: *any* comment made by
> *anyone* (including this one) is only advice to be considered; if anyone's
> trying to tell you otherwise, then *certainly* only take it as advice.

Ah. Then perhaps you might not want to make wide-sweeping statments as
you've been doing without data &/or experience to back it up.


Of course, this is all IMO and you can ignore it if you wish.

(that ought to make it easier to ignore...)


Brian W. Allison

Computer Scientist Vocalist Would-be Poet Bicycler Scuba Diver
Hacker(0xca) Nerd(79) GenX(21) #include <witticism.h>
http://www.wam.umd.edu/~ballison

--- Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail is not welcome at this account ---
--- and will result in a US$500 fee per US Code Title 47 Sec 227. ---

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.