Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: 6 gas vents on a minigun (was Re: Assault cannons)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 12:54:01 +0100
Robert Pendergrast (Tom) said on 10:43/ 6 Dec 96...

> Yeah, but isn't the penalty from recoil attributed to the barrel<s>
> kicking the gun up at an angle? The spinning would counter that wouldn't
> it? (BTW, I'm not speaking from ANY real life experience here, just SRII
> and what little intuition I have.)

Recoil goes in the direction opposite the path taken by the bullet. It's
the way the weapon is built and/or held by the firer that causes the
muzzle to climb. For example, recoil will push a straight back when it's
fired; if the top of the butt in a rifle is below the barrel, a turning
movement will result around the firer's shoulder. This is the reason why
weapons like the M16 are of a "straight through" layout -- find a picture
of an M16 and put a ruler along the barrel to see what I mean.

I think you're right in that the spinning barrels would prevent muzzle
climb to some extent, if the gun pivots around a point that allows the
recoiling force to push the gun up a bit.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Laat het los.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.