Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Sascha Pabst <Sascha.Pabst@**********.UNI-OLDENBURG.DE>
Subject: Re: Spelllocks....
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 1996 22:16:31 +0000
On 6 Dec 96 at 9:03, The Jestyr wrote:
[snip]
> Yeah, but *foci* give you extra dice for particular actions (and in the
> case of Weapon foci, have added advantages). A spell lock just maintains
> a spell. Useful, yes, but not nearly *as* useful.
SRII, p.138: ''Spell locks are special foci that establish a link with astral
space and channel astral energy into a spell, allowing it to be sustained
without the casting magician's concentration or concern.''
Read: Special _FOCUS_.

[snip]
> Oo-er. Even allowing for defining spell locks as foci, I wouldn't go this
> far. Focus addiction in particular (which is what I assume this thread was
> referring to) is meant to reflect an ever-increasing reliance on the extra
> power/boost given to you by your foci, and a subsconscious laziness on
> your part. Spell locks don't give you extra power in this way, so I don't
> think the rationale behind focus addiction will suffice.
What do you think spell locks do but give the magician's power a boost?
Increasing an attribute, or reactions, does sound like a power boost to me.

Sascha
--
+---___---------+------------------------------------+------------------------+
| / / _______ | Jhary-a-Conel aka Sascha Pabst |Things that try to look |
| / /_/ ____/ |Sascha.Pabst@ | like things often do |
| \___ __/ | Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.de | look more like things |
|==== \_/ ======|*Wearing hats is just a way of life*| than things. Well known|
|LOGOUT FASCISM!| - Me | fact. - E.Weatherwax |
+------------- http://www.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de/~jhary -----------------+

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.