Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@****.ORG>
Subject: Re: Spelllocks....
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 13:21:18 -0700
I accidently replied privately to Justin, and he replied to
me. Here's what happened while you were away :)

Justin Pinnow wrote:
|
|David Buehrer wrote:
|
|> Justin Pinnow wrote:
|
|> |Well, I don't see how that explains everything. Anchorings use material
|> |objects just as spell locks and foci do...thus, they would also have
|> |"artificial additives".
|
|> But spell locks use material object that are applied to the mage, whereas
|> Anchorings are applied by the mage. Foci are bonded to the mage, a mage
|> bonds an anchored spell to an object. Foci are foreign, anchorings are an
|> extension of the mage.
|
|> |Also, are you stating that it's the added physical component that causes
|> |addiction? If so, fetishes and fetish foci should count as well.
|> |Obviously, that doesn't work well.
|
|> Fetishes don't require karma. I don't know about fetish foci though (is
|> there really such a thing? I haven't read Grimy in a long time).
|
|Now it appears that you are making up rules to justify a ruling. ;) I
|like the idea of focus addiction (don't get me wrong), but I just don't
|think it's wise to invent a long list of clarifiers to determine whether
|or not something causes focus addiction just to justify the ruling by
|FASA.

Hey, I'm just trying to clarify what Andrew said :)

|To me there isn't a significant difference between the power you gain
|from using a spell lock and a quickening. They both do very similar
|things, only with slightly different mechanics. Yes, one has a physical
|component and the other doesn't, but that's not the point of focus
|addiction. The point is that the mage becomes "addicted" to having that
|extra power at his beck and call. Thus, he becomes to reliant upon that
|external power and has problems being effective if that power is no
|longer available. How does a spell lock give a significant amount of
|power to a mage that he can't also get from a quickening? Let's not
|lose sight of the fact that focus addiction is a game balance technique
|created by FASA to keep mages from gaining exceedingly powerful foci
|with no reprocussions.

Hmmm... To date none of my players have used Quickenings,
so I haven't had to deal with this yet (the one player with
a mage is also the one that's easily confused :)

|Fetish foci are a specific type of foci (fetish?) that are easy to
|enchant. They are in the Grimmy. Basically, you get a one-time boost
|when you use them. You could have a Force 4 Combat Fetish Foci. This
|would give you four extra dice to use to enhance EITHER ONE spell
|success test OR ONE drain resistance test related to combat
|spellcasting. Once used, the fetish is no longer usable...these cost
|3,000Y for every level of the fetish focus. They are a nice quick fix
|for those tight spots you might not otherwise be able to pull yourself
|out of. You get some of the advantages of a foci without having to pay
|HUGE amounts of money to buy one and without any karma cost. It's
|always nice to have one for combat or healing just in case you need a
|little extra oomph sometime. (Keep in mind that you just spent 12,000Y
|in the above example to cast ONE spell....) Fetish foci also fulfill
|the requirement of having to use a fetish for spellcasting if you have
|such a limitation on a spell (providing you use the fetish to cast that
|spell, of course.)

Thanks for the explanation.

-David

/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\ dbuehrer@****.org /^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\
"His thoughts tumbled in his head, making and breaking
alliances like underpants in a dryer without Cling Free."
~~~http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm~~~~

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.