Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Tim Cooper <tpcooper@***.CSUPOMONA.EDU>
Subject: Re: Matrix awakening
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 01:36:38 -0800
On Wed, 11 Dec 1996, Loki wrote:

> > I don't know, call me a purist or something, but I just don't like that
> > concept. It just seems wrong to me to start allowing magic to influence
> > the matrix. The fundamental principle of magic is the manipulation of
> > mana and such, I just have a hard time accepting the use of magic on an
> > entirely "imaginary" realm...which the Matirx is.
>
> That's the point! In my world it's a rumor, and the people designing it
> are just the kind of people the group wants to stop from having that type
> of access to the matrix. The mana jack research is not a good thing. It's
> like a small cabal trying to bridge their way into the only realm they feel
> they can't dominate at the moment. A parallel to "The Bridge" in Harly 2,
> if you will.

I'm not talking about plot lines and interesting story twists...I'm
talking about a completely 'out of character', 'this doesn't fit into the
Shadowrun role-playing-game', response. I guess you could have some
people try doing it, but as a GM I wouldn't allow that type of thing to
work. (sorry, I'm a bit behind on SR modules and haven't seen
Harlq.2..actually haven't bought a module in a few years..)

> >It's on par with creating some spell that would allow a mage access to a
> >smartgun-link with out the cyberware...or something.
>
> Guess you haven't read Awakenings and seen the Enhanced Aim spell yet. ;o)

Seen Awakenings, and remember seeing the Enhanced Aim spell, but don't
remember exactly what it did.

Never the less I was refering to a spell that would let a mage tap into
a smart-linked weapon and recieve the targeting data that the link
provided with out actually having the cyber-ware or goggles.

>
> > ~Tim
>
> @>--'--,--- Loki


~Tim

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.