Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Harley's Back
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 12:13:49 +0100
Droopy said on 19:25/20 Dec 96...

> I do include Mike and Lou in that hope, BTW. Let's put it this way,
> I don't see a huge problem with individuals finding the portal other
> than the normal time travel paradoxes, but imagine if say, a major
> horror was to discover that portal. Horrors would be lining up to go
> through that puppy.
>
> In the same way, a properly outfitted force could go back and destroy
> the balance in ED, perhaps changing the timeline. Such things are
> not to be taken lightly.

If you'd allow unlimited access to such a portal, then yes, it could
seriously disrupt either or both of the ED or SR worlds in your campaign.
OTOH, there's always the possibility of making it unreliable or dangerous
in some way. A few ways I can think of right now are to make it a one-shot
affair (you can go through but you can't go back), make people going
through it grow weaker all the time (let them take/resist damage every
day, representing some kind of cosmic law about being away from their
"native time"), have the portal change its destination every once in a
while (so nobody going through knows where they will end up), saying that
timelines are impossible to alter (because the future is set: whatever the
players do, it won't change the world as they know it).

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
And then I realized I had 65,407,413 bytes of stuff in my
C:\Shadowrun directory...
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.