Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Spike <u5a77@*****.CS.KEELE.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: Silly questions...:)
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 14:07:04 +0000
|
|Hey... Does anyone have a Tickle Me Elmos Doll?

AAAAARGH!!!!!

Stopitstopitstopit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

|<just joking>

Not funny....
Apart from the fact that I've no idea what one is, that thread has been
plaguing usenet now for a couple of weeks......

|For those of you who don't know what I'm babbling about because you don't
|live in the states, the Tickle Me Elmo is the newest kiddie craze here...
|It's a $30.00 plush red doll based on a Sesame Street Muppet that giggles
|maniaclly and vibrates violently when you push its stomach or sides...
|
|Anywaysm, the doll has been IMPOSSIBLE to find in the stores for the last
|couple months, and they are being sold outside of the stores for close to
|$1000.00 now...

Over here, it's apparently Buzz Lightyear that's impossible to get.....
Fortunately.... I don't have any kiddie relatives.....

At least, none that I've ever met.....

|I work in a Video Store, and we get very desperate people asking us if we
|carry these things... Yeah, right...
|
|I HATE Elmo... almost as bad a Barney...

NOTHING, apart from maybe Wesley Crusher, is as bad as barney.....
--
______________________________________________________________________________
|u5a77@*****.cs.keele.ac.uk| "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
|Andrew Halliwell | |
|Principal subjects in:- | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
|Comp Sci & Electronics | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/EL>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ |
|X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can't say F**K either now! >*SULK*<|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.