Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <loki@*******.COM>
Subject: Re: Spirit Threat Dice (was Re: CZ Attack Questions
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 00:19:01 -0000
> > I usually allow spirits and elemantals to add in their threat rating
dice
> > when rolling to resist spells, they are made out of the ethereal fabric
of
> > magic afterall... ;o)
>
> WRT giving Spirits (of any type) a Threat Rating equal to the Force:

OK, what's WRT?

> Consider that Prime Runners (p 102) suggests a Threat Rating of F/2 for
> spirits as a first guess. (IMO too generous, but WTH...)
>
> Consider that the Great Dragon Rhonabwy has a Magical Threat of 12. His
> Magic Rating is 25, as are his Sorcery and Conjuring.
>
> Are you saying that Spirits are twice as ferocious as everything else?
> That'd make a Force 12 spirit as Threatening as a GREAT DRAGON!

Keep in mind it says over and over in the books that suggested threat
ratings are merely a guideline. In the source book it even suggest
multiplying threat ratings by 1.5 times if NPC's aren't a match for your
players.

My players play smart and hard, and so far I've found giving spirits a
threat rating equal to force gives the game balance and threat they like.
So I'll keep it as that.

Personally I find giving a Great Dragon any kind of threat rating
ludicrous. Hell, they won't even list stats for Harlequin, but they'll slap
a threat rating of twelve on a Great Dragon???

Besides, I thought most people on the list wrote Prime Runners off as a
source not really to be consulted or quoted. ;o)

@>--'--,--- Loki

/>
/<
[\\\\\\(O):::<======================================-
\< Poisoned Elves http://www.netzone.com/~loki
\>


"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.