Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Max Rible <slothman@*********.ORG>
Subject: Re: World Map
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 17:43:21 -0800
At 00:36 4/3/97 +0100, Avenger wrote:
>But looking more to the civilisations of South/Central America. That
>Mayan contructions, (and this comes from "official" archaeological
>material) *may* be greater than 10,000 years old. Some are acknowledged
>to be between 5 and 7,000. The newer ones are 500 - 2,000+ And
>although much of these civilisations and their buildings is still buried
>in the jungles, it has stood up amazingly well to time, and they're not
>just caves. :)

Are these freestanding buildings or things that are being dug out of the
ground? And are these even the Mayans, or some older mesoamerican people?
I thought the Mayans were a strictly first millennium CE bunch. The
Olmecs go back to the early second millennium BCE, but I didn't think
they had anything left standing. The Pueblo Indians had some interesting
cliff dwellings, but those are closer to the Aztec era, not very long
before Columbus showed up.

>There was also a recent discovery of a village somewhere or other, that
>is almost perfectly preserved, showing thatched roofed constructions of
>a few thousands years age.

Buried structures aren't habitable as is, have a tendency to crumble
when you pull the dirt out of them, and are unlikely to be useful places
for territory-seeking metahumans to settle. (Extremely inspiring to
peoples who would appreciate having a history to be proud of, yes.
A place to settle, no...)

> So.. who's to say what's buried under the
>sands of the middle east.

Babylon, Sumer, Uruk...

> After all, there is some considerable digging
>in Israel outside a couple of their towns, where they think they've
>found sites mentioned in the bible. There are a considerable number of
>constructions from the Native American tribes that stretch back a long
>ways, so, buildings and constructions surviving isn't so strange.

Are any of these constructions remotely habitable by human beings?

> if
>they are put together well enough, and the Dwarves _are_ master
>craftsmen, then ther is no reason they couldn't survive.

Two words: "tectonic activity".

> the insistence of elves in having a
>history, would, I think, logically set off other races into finding out
>the truth of the matter, and investigating their own past.

One decently-preserved kaer with evidence of lots of non-Elves getting
along together could do a great deal for the self esteem of metahumans.
It doesn't need to be habitable-- just documentable!

--
%% Max Rible %% slothman@*****.com %% http://www.amurgsval.org/~slothman/ %%
%% "So, an Arisian, a Vorlon, and a knnn go into a tavern..." %%

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.