Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Court Schuett <schuett@*****.IVCC.EDU>
Subject: Re: Skill Ideas
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 07:41:48 -0500
At 11:15 AM 4/7/97 +0100, Gurth wrote:
>MARTIN E. GOTTHARD said on 10:21/ 7 Apr 97...
>
>> I've always been a fan of equating physical stats to general size, but
>> there are also cases where it's not appropriate. Who wants to play a
>> female character with six body and strength if she's gonna be the bush
>> pig from hell?
>
>OTOH, if you do introduce some kind of "high attributes = big body" rule,
>then it should apply equally to all characters. The drawback you mention
>is a social one, because most people don't think large women with highly
>developed muscles are beautiful; for men, though, it is considered a good
>thing to look like a body builder. Unfortunately, there's not much that
>can be done about this...
>
>--
I've played a few times where I made the characters made the characters
make Body tests to squeeze into a really small space. Only thing I didn't
mention was I wanted misses. Boy did that throw the 13 Body, extrmely
Munchkin players that brought his own character to my game for a loop. He
rolls his 13 dice against a target number of 4, then looks at me all
smiling, 10 successes. Oooh, only 3 misses, nope you couldn't squeeze in.
I liked it, and it seemed to work well.
-Court

/* Court Schuett, a totally modern boy.

schuett@*****.ivcc.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~
so she said fuck this town
nothing's ever going down
spun herself round and round
drilled herself into the ground
twenty kids fell in that hole
i was twenty-one, out of control
she crawled right inside my brain
she's some mental hurricane
-Too Much Joy

****************************************************************************
***/

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.