Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Stats Limitations (was Re: Skill Limitations)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 12:29:53 +0100
David Buehrer said on 7:31/17 Apr 97...

> Anyway, this has got me thinking about applying SOTA-like rules to
> stats. Once a character has increased their strength to 6, they better
> spend a lot of time maintaining that (spending Karma). Ditto for Body
> and Quickness. Intelligence wouldn't require much maintenance (if any).
> Willpower would require some (by taking time out for "quality time").
> And Charisma would require some too. Aside from the fact that this
> could become a bookkeeping nightmare, what are your thoughts?

Don't do it... Like you say, it's a bookkeeping nightmare, and I don't
think it's something that will come up in many games anyway, because a lot
of them don't run for the time needed to pay upkeep (gods, that's a M:TG
term...) for your stats. A better way to do this, I think, would be like
other people suggested recently, and reduce them at a fixed age -- sort of
like in AD&D, where you lose something off certain stats when you reach
middle or old age.

Also, if you do this for stats, then do it for skills as well: if a
character doesn't use a skill for X months, reduce it by a point. Then
allow them to pay less than full Karma to bring it back up to its original
rating -- which represents the "oh yeah, it went like _that_" factor that
makes re-learning something easier than learning it for the first time.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Do you remember, when you were someone else?
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.