Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Ben Frech <frech@***.COM>
Subject: Re: Physads and weapon foci
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 17:57:50 -0700
Rune Fostervoll wrote:
>
> Weapon foci rating adds to skill only , not weapon power.

I misread the paragraph on weapon foci: it adds its rating to damage
in astral combat, not physical. My mistake. :\

> I believe it is,
> if not in the rules, a very common house rule, that starting physads, mages
> and so on may spend 'force points' on bonding equipment. Assuming the same
> physad instead had armed combat 6, specialized in katana, uses a rating 6
> weapon foci katana for 14 skill, then spends all his physad points on
> edged weapons.. he'd roll 26 dice w.o. combat pool with that weapon.
>

I thought the most you could get is 18 + combat pool:
8 for katana specialization + 4 from physad powers + 6 for weapon focus

> Sad munchkinism... yes. He'd be able to do nothing else; if he lost his katana
> and got a normal katana, he'd only get 16 dice base with it. (ONLY!!)
> He also spent as much money on it that someone else could have spent
> on making an attack gunship - it's a risky use of resources.
>
> This assumes the following:
> Weapon foci skill increase *IS* a skill increase, not just added dice,
> and so increases the amount of dice that can be added from physad power
> or combat pool.

I don't think this is the case...

>
> Munchkinism? Seriously.. use a Halberd or similar weapon - THEN it'd
> be munchkin... if the GM didn't stop him.
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Frech
frech@********.com
http://www.realtime.net/~frech/

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.