| From: | MC23 <mc23@**********.COM> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Noticing Spellcasting |
| Date: | Sat, 26 Apr 1997 21:27:02 -0400 |
>So how about we agree - yes, the rulebooks seem to imply that some
>gesturing usually accompanies spellcasting, but those who don't want to
>use it in their games are perfectly justified?
The rule book doesn't imply, it states it, just not that well
apparently. How it is run though, will always vary from GM to GM, like
all rules.
>I know that when I'm GMing, looks will kill.
I would be fond of using a penalty for it, if I allowed it. Although
I would go with a +2 target modifier as opposed to Kenson's +1.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Ancient cultures believed that names held great power, personal names
more so and they were guarded very closely. To protect themselves, they
answered to another name, because if another discovered their real name,
it could be used against them.
History repeats itself.
Welcome to the Digital Age.
I am MC23
