From:	NightLife <habenir@******.SAN.UC.EDU>
Subject:	Re: Pro's & munchies was Re: Runnersºd Tenants?
Date:	Sun, 4 May 1997 23:44:00 -0400

>Fine, I figured somebody would.
>
>But, in all honesty there is no defence for the rules lawyer. They are
>an irritating infestation onto what could be a smooth flowing game. The
>rules lawyer will argue all and every point if it doesn't suit their
>interpretation of the rules system, they take great pleasure in
>destroying games, players and GMs as a result of this continual arguing.
>The rules lawyer is the worst of all possible munchkins, they are too
>cowardly to run their own games, yet continually contradict those of
>other people.
>

Why Dark Avenger I think I'm in love. ;-)

>Oh, so you think the GM should sit there and accept the crap they're
>going to get from a contradictory munchkin player who simply wants the
>game to go his way, and bugger everyone else?
>
>That is an interesting statement you have made, and open to considerable
>argument. If the GM doesn't have the right to set the rules for the
>game, then who does? The players? I don't think so. The type of
>player we are discussing here is likely to demand a rule that suits
>their style of play and their character type. Unacceptable.

Huzzah!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nightlife Inc.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Ah at last! The TRANSFORMATION is complete!
For YEARS they mocked me! They took the name EMMANUEL LEWIS in vain!
But tonight RETRIBUTION will be mine!
For I am REBORN as --WEBSTER--, The adorable scamp of DOOM!
Ma'am's and Georges beware Webster walks the earth and he's got a
HANKERIN' for some SPANKERIN'!

Man did I nail this mad doctor routine or WHAT?
"Deadpool #4"

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Document Classified
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<