Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Bryan L. Nylander" <bryan_nylander@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Online Shadowrun Gaming
Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 17:47:15 -0700
Skye Comstock wrote:
>
> >Andy,
> > I would be honored if you where interested in gaming in Elis.There's
> >Plenty of room to go around.
> >
> > I have an Established IRC channel on Undernet with about 90ish
> >regurlare user base. This is not a Gaming channel, nore do we really
> >allow Gaming in it. We do have Many regurlars that are Interested in
> >undertaking some Kick in the Buttux gaming time. So, I have always loved
> >SR,, do to the fact that it is so RICH in options... So, I desided to
> >put together a second Bot, and a second Channel #DarkRunner.
>
> Ok, boyo, we have a little problem. There is already an established
> Shadowrun channel on Undernet, it's #Shadowrun. I don't know what
> you are trying to do, with this little thing, but please, don't
> steer people away from our channel. If you want to hold games,
> fine. I would just be much happier if you would stop being an
> asshole in #Shadowrun and ignoring #Shadowrun as a Shadowrun
> channel on Undernet.
>
> -Skye, "I just don't give a damn."

Excuse me Skye,

I have not walked into #shadowRun on Undernet and have been some kind
of asshole. I have absolutely no intentions of distroying #shadowrun,
now or in the future. I do however have a little problem with Clammed
Dibed right of All shadowrun gaming from #shadowrun. When you have 1
channel for A place to game,, and you have to deal with the Ops of
#shadowRun ignoring questions, and dealing with newcomer, from what I
have seen Rather Poorly.

like I have said, I already have a +90 user base with a % of them
interested in playing ShadowRun.

Is there something I have missed on this mailing List? Does #shadowRun
on Undernet hold Full and ONLY rights to have Online Gaming for IRC? If
so, this ML and from what I can see, that Channel is in a world of
hurt. I have had about 5 of my users, Interested in learning about
ShadowRun, go to #Shadowrun, to be fully ignored, and subject to far
Less then cordial responces. Including slide remarks do to nicks.
Personally,, I am more then happy to work and would love to be part of
#shadowrun. I have not gone in and been some kind of prick in there. I
have responded to sour attaudes given to me, because I am not a
Regurlare there.

It has appeared to me, and few that have gone to #shadowrun, that this
is very much a CLICK type of situration. If we are not welcome to
#shadowRun, thats fine. Its not like I have then alot Newbie to
#shadowrun-game to swamp that channel with a large learning curve. I
have set up a Shadowrun BOT. Something that can be used for a GAME. Im I
to assume that this Mailing List does not welcome this? Is this Mailing
List part of securing the USER base of an IRC channel, then by all
means, I have made a Horable Mistake. I thought this was a MailingList
for ShadowRun. For Players of the game.. Please, would the Admin of this
Mailing list please correct me if I am wrong on this.

Personally, I do not see that ops in an offical Shadowrun channel has
rights to great users and playes of the game pourly. BUT,, that I guess
is up to those that Define Offical Shadowrun Channel.

My only goal here is to play some SR.I have alot of friends, around the
world, interested in the same. I will recomend ALL who I know to stay
Clear from #shadowrun and #shadowrun-game so's not to interfer with your
channel. If the Admins of this ML wishes me to take my questions, and
the things I do concerning ShadowRun else where, I am more then willing
to do so.

Sorry for bringing this all to you, but look at it this way... I
remembered to add to the END of the E.

If this does end up my last post, realize the channel is there. it is
not some Shadowrun POLLICAL thing, its just a place to play a GAME. Hope
you all have fun, and Ill see you in Elis.

BlkWolfLH Alpha LanHunter

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.