Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Caric <caric@********.COM>
Subject: Re: Metahuman Shapeshifters?
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 11:05:20 -0700
| >The aura is what ever you want it to be, so realy if the Troll's
| >idealic
| >self is viewed as a piasma then he looks like one in astral space. We
| >had a mage that saw herself as a black widow, not that she had an
| >connection to insect totems.
|
|
| No, your aura *always* reveals your true form. The only exception here is
| that of Aura Masking. Your astral form will appear as your idealic self,
| but will still reveal your true form unless you are capable of Masking
| your aura. Your astral form and your aura are not exactly the same.
| They're close, even related, but they are not the same. Assensing one's
| aura or astral form will always reveal one's true form, with the only
| exception being when someone is masking said aura.
| It's not explicitly stated, but that's what I'm getting from the book.

Correct Canthros, AKAIK the only real decisions you can make regarding your
auras appearance (without masking) is to add/change clothing and add other
tidbits like a staff or something like that. This staff wouldn't be good
for anything but looks, but it couls be there. I believe the default is an
idealized naked form of the magician. Now I am deriving most of this
opinion from novels granted, but Canthros is still correct about the aura
thing. :)


-Caric

"These pretzels are MAKING ME THIRSTY!!!!!"

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.