Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: [SR3] Drain
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 13:08:10 +0100
Steve Kenson said on 13:12/ 3 Jul 97...

> Many people have suggested setting Spell Drain TNs back at Force instead of
> F/2. What do people think of this? Please remember, I need to know WHY you
> think the idea is good or bad.

I don't think it's a good idea. Many of the spells that are really worth
knowing have S or D drain, often with a plus to the Drain Target, and
basing Drain off the full force will IMHO only make magicians pass out
after a few spells, or at least take so much Stun damage they're hardly
useful anymore because of the TN and initiative modifiers. An often-seen
argument in favor of keeping Drain at F/2 is that someone with a gun can
shoot someone dead without suffering Stun damage from doing so, and it's
an idea I support.

Put Drain at full Force and I think you'll find lots of magicians won't
bother with combat spells, for the simple reason that a firearm will kill
just as well (say a 10S shotgun against someone wearing an armor jacket)
as a spell (Force 5 power bolt for example) and without any fatigue for
the shooter.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Without lies, there'd be 100% divorce rate, a lot of discontented
children, and no advertising industry.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.