Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Request for feedback.
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 02:19:09 -0700
---WILLIAM T COLEMAN wrote:
>
> I was looking for some feedback on three things that had recently
came up
> in our campaign:
>
> 1- What do other GM's think of using the Tattoo Magic rules (pps.
96 -
> 97 UNDERWORLD SOURCEBOOK) to "etch" a Quickened spell on a sword or
some
> other object?

Sounds more like an anchoring issue than tattoo magic.

> 2- What would happen if a magician quickened a spell that was only
> active on the astral? Would the spell sit at the spot it was cast
at?
> What if the spell was Astral Blade (p.10 Shadowland Volume 6?)

Haven't seen the spell so I can't comment. My impression is that a
quickend spell is tied to the "physical" item the quickening was
placed on, much like a spell lock w/o the foci.

> 3- When speaking about the Physical Adept Ability of Improved
Physical
> Senses (p.125 SRII) the book says that, "Unless an improvement
involves a
> radio or similar technological phenomena, anything that can be
improved
> by cyberware can be improved by this power." Would the GM's out
there
> support buying Physical Adept versions of the Spatial Recognizer and
the
> Balance Augmentor (p. 24 CYBERTECHNOLOGY)?

I'd say yes, both could easily be physad abilities. However, w/o
having my books right with me, I can't if I'd rule each at the .25
cost.

===

@>--,--'--- Loki <gamemstr@********.com>

Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/

If in your adventures you happen across the skull of a dragon, turn
and leave that place quickly. Whatever killed the dragon may still be
around.

_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.