Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Simon T. Sailer" <Simon.Sailer@****.AC.AT>
Subject: Re: [SR3] Combat Spells -- Level 6?
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 16:40:44 +0100
> I usually prioritize my spells, a few at 5-6, and the rest at 4's or less, to
> try to get enough variety. But we usually only have one magician in the party
> and so I don't have any magical 'backup'. Usually one of the combat spells is
> a 6, with an area-effect backup at 4, and one of the more utility spells is
> also a 5-6, the rest at lower levels depending on what force I think I need for
> the character. This is also what I've seen every other SR gamer I've played
> with do, but I've had the luck of not playing with too many munchkins.
>
> losthalo

There is a bid difference between someone who uses the more effective
way and a munchkin.
Choose one spell less and increase the efficiency of 5 others by
100%. Thats not munchkinous, that's common sense.
(of course, this only counts for resisted spells... Not only combat
spells)

ss (who defends his players ;)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.