Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Caric <caric@********.COM>
Subject: Re: [SR3] Combat Spells
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 10:15:54 -0700
| [lots and lots of Drain discussion snipped]
|
| O-kaaaaay. I would like to put the Drain discussion on hold for a bit.
I've
| gotten a lot of good feedback, but it seems like things have gotten down
to
| the "is not! is so!" level of discussion.

DID NOT!!!!

Sorry. :)

<Snip>

| How about this: make Combat and Damaging Manipulation (DM) spells both
work
| just like Ranged Combat damage; the target of the spell has to stage the
| damage ALL the way down to nothing instead of just beating the caster on
| successes (I know DMs already work this way, but bear with me). The
| proceedure:

I think that this would clear up alot of the problem that I had with
raising the drain, and it would allow for a more diverse mage/shaman with
his starting force points. If the drain was raised to F then it would
bring it back into balance. I like it, but I think that the people who
already felt magic was too powerful might disagree with it. It also
changes to a question of the magic users skill as opposed to a race to see
who can get the highest attribute.

| EXAMPLE:
|
| Caric the street mage squares off against NightLife, the samurai : )

Stop...i'm blushing.

| The above is an extreme example: a Willpower 6 target SHOULD be tough to
| affect, but under this sceheme, Caric still did damage. Under the current
| system, he would have done none. Against an opponent of equal Will 4:

Agreed they should be tough, but not impossible which is what you have
addressed. The force 3 and 4 spells could now have more use and the Dart
and Missle spells would be more effective as well.

| How does something like this work for everyone?

Works for me...sorry about the wound Nightlife...Steve made me do it. :)

-Caric

"These pretzels are MAKING ME THIRSTY!!!!!"

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.