Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Bruce H. Nagel" <NAGELBH@******.ACS.MUOHIO.EDU>
Subject: Re: [SR3] Magical Magic
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 1997 23:22:18 -0500
You wrote:
> I have a problem with that, if you are going to use variable staging it
> needs to be on both ends of the weapon. Typically the shooter will have
> lower target numbers then the target already so they would have the
> advantage. ie: Guy shooting pistol with damage code of 6M3 gun is smart
> and he is at short range shooter needs 2's and the target needs 6's. If
> shooter only needs 4 successes to hit for D and the target needs 3 to get
> it back down then it could be slightly overbalanced IMHO.
How does this make him 'smart'? My reasoning behind 2 Staging to raise damage
and variable to resist is that generally all weapons require a similar degree
of skill to wield (with some exceptions, primarily projectile or other
non-firearm weapons). OTOH, it is certainly much harder to take a MMG round
and live than a .22short pistol round. Variable staging helps model that
effect irl. Otherwise, I high body gives at least a chance of garnering the
successes to withstand that level of damage, regardless of the seriousness of
the damage. Coupled with good armor, a high body attribute goes a long way to
countering firearms. Whereas, if you had to get 1.5 times as many successes,
even with a high body you cannot as easily get the successes to resist a MMG or
high-power rifle as you can a pistol. It doesn't really matter how tough you
are if hit by a MMG round, though theoretically a pistol wound can be coped
with better by bigger, tougher individuals. I would really recommend that Body
dice to reduce damage be eliminated (they're called Soak Rolls in Storyteller
and Ars Magica, and I think they're just a way to let characters survive things
that ordinary humans cannot survive). But that's just me, and I know I won't
see that in SR, so I'll stop blathering now.

losthalo

> -Caric

> "If a man talks in the forest, and there isn't a woman around to hear him,
> is he still wrong?"

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.