Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: [SR3] Karma and Attributes
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 21:08:15 -0700
---MC23 wrote:
>
> Then maybe the rate you give out Karma should be reviewed. My
group
> only gives out 2-3 Karma points a session as a general rule. Karma
become
> too valuable to spend on multiple increases that way.

Ok, maybe "shortly" was a bad choice of a word. I don't mean they all
hit racial max in three or four gaming sessions. But they tend to
eventually. As for Karma awards. I'd say I average 1-3 per player each
session. One or two players have even said I'm too light on awards,
but it averages out in the end.

> >Basically, racial max's and karma cost for raising attributes stand
as
> >listed in the BBB. However, each character has his own personal cap
on
> >how far he can raise each attribute equal to 1.5x it's starting
value
> >(rounded up). Mind you the 1.5x limit is after factoring in racial
> >modifiers at character creation.
>
> And if you start with a stat of 1?

You cap out at 2. Individual limits are 1.5x starting attribute
(rounded up).
1 --> 2
2 --> 3
3 --> 5
4 --> 6
5 --> 8
6 --> 9
And so on...

Karma costs and racial max's are per BBB. Those who are able may
exceed to 1.5x racial max at double karma cost over racial max.

Makes cyber/bioware or increase att spells a little more important,
don't it? :o)

===
@>--,--'--- Loki

Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/

"You're being held up by a stim patch, Loki's almost a pile of ashes
thanks to that fire elemental, and we've got the Baron running around
screaming assassins...assassins...oh eek, assassins!"
--> Caric to Ook during the Harlequin Campaign
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.