From:	Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject:	Spell types (was Re: Centering vs Penalties)
Date:	Sun, 13 Jul 1997 12:32:24 +0100

Caric said on 6:56/12 Jul 97...

> Wouldn't there have to be something there with an aura? Even if it's just
> a chair or a marble that the sammie tossed? Unless it's a DM I would say
> that there has to be some targetmore precis then just "over there."

Why does everyone treat SR magic as having spells and damaging
manipulations?

SR rulebooks don't, AFAIK, say anything about having to have a target on
which an area-effect spell must be centered, and I allow any spell,
including combat spells, to be aimed at a point in space.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
Forget about the ones who "have it all."
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------