Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Peter David Boddy <pdboddy@****.CARLETON.CA>
Subject: Re: [SR3] Karma and Attributes
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 01:41:05 EDT
TopCat writes:
> >I would disagree with this. 6 represents the Maximum Average, ( if
> >that makes sense). 1.5 times racial max is the buffest ever....max
> >is a REASONABLE buffest. anything above Racial Max is bloody rare,
> >and Racial Max is rare, but NOT buffest. I'd say about 25% of the
> >people going to top universities have the equivilant of INT 6. And
> >they aren't necessarily the most intelligent ever....just on the
> >highest end of reasonable.
>
> Actually 1.5 times racial max is an *optional* maximum. See pgs. 42-43, 46,
> and 190 in SRII for the exact canonical wording. Disagree if you like but
> the words are there for the seeing. I, personally, don't allow players to
> naturally exceed racial max in the campaigns that I GM as an anti-powergamer
> measure.

The way I see it, 6 is the maximum for a normal human (with the various
differences max for the metas). Anything above that is either
cyberware/bioware, or a freak of nature (I mean this in a nice way, =) ).

BTW, what would Einstein's (sp?) intelligence be? For physics, I'd call
him a god, for tying his shoes, well, he was a little on the slow side,
from what I have heard said about him...

Pete

Pete aka Spitfire
Test your might...
at http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/8920/index.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter David Boddy
Carleton University
Email address: pdboddy@****.carleton.ca
Email address: bx955@*******.carleton.ca
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.