Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Spell types (was Re: Centering vs Penalties)
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 11:55:23 +0100
J. Keith Henry said on 18:40/15 Jul 97...

> > Furthermore, I don't see what the big fuss is about -- there is no
> > difference to the resistance if an area-effect combat spell is aimed at a
> > person or a meter beside him/her.
>
> Actually, there is a BIG difference. If it is at the person/spot next to
> someone else, then two damage ranges are dealt with. First one is the person
> the spell is actually ground into, s/he/it has no armor bonuses, because it
> is his/her/its aura that is being ground into. The second area is the "blast
> zone" of the combat spell. Think of it like a dam being opened. The hole
> where the water is going through is directly affected by the power, while the
> surrounding region is caught in the "secondary wash". Thus, the question
of
> armor counting for those caught in the blast versus those that are the target
> point of the blast.

Good idea, except I've always understood that that doesn't happen to
with spells. They're not grenades that detonate at a certain point and
then move outward; the effects of a spell appear in the whole area at the
same moment.

I just checked SRII (page 130) and the Grimoire (page 111) and
unfortunately neither gives an indication which of the ttwo
interpretations is right. In fact especially the text in the Grimoire is
ambiguous enough to be open to both interpretations :(

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
"Don't you ever wonder if you ARE wasting your life?"
"Only when I'm awake."
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.