Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Nukes vs. Horrors
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 12:39:43 +0100
david lowe said on 22:49/16 Jul 97...

> Ok, this may be an old topic, but bear with me. My players have managed to
> let a major NPC get ahold of an Ares tactical nuke. (Well, it wasn't
> exactly their falt, but try explaining that to the Ares harddudes).
> Anyways, she plans to use it later in the game to get revenge,
> unfourtunately, there will be a Horror in the vicinity when (and if) it
> goes off. A major Horror. IYHOs, would it affect the Horror? I belive that,
> since Horrors exist primarily on the Astral, that it would not affect them,
> and the pain and suffering the nuke caused would actually 'feed' the
> Horror. Comments, suggestions.

There are three types of Horrors: those that exist on the physical plane,
those that exist on the astral plane, and those that exist on both at the
same time. Fully physical Horrors should be blown away by a nuke, IMHO,
while fully-astral ones would probably love the experience as astral space
gets polluted beyond anything else that's available in SR. From that, dual
Horrors would get their physical bodies killed, but that won't really hurt
them -- the only way to get rid of a dual-natured Horror permanently is to
kill both the physical and astral bodies, else the Horror can easily find
another physical body, or somehow "regenerate" the astral one.

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
"Don't you ever wonder if you ARE wasting your life?"
"Only when I'm awake."
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5++ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.