| From: | TopCat <topcat@***.NET> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [SR3] Combat Spells |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jul 1997 12:51:31 -0500 |
>At 12:33 AM 7/18/97 -0500, Bruce wrote:
>>Y'know, I think I've vehemently disagreed with you on occasion, Bob, but that
>>makes sense and I agree completely. If the system starts at a simple balance,
>>it's easy to modify to what you want (I modify games a lot, and some *are* a
>>pain because they rely too much on the balance expected of the characters in
>>the campaign). SR is currently comfy as-is, power-wise, and tinkering should
>>be kept to things which don't alter that balance in favor of any sort of
>>character, imo.
>
>YES!! Good deal, someone else that understands...
>
>>I hope this was a little more than a 'me too'.
>
>It was, but this post of mine was not.
Damn, got that backwards...
that last line there should read "It *wasn't*, but this post of mine *was*"
Sorry about that...
--
Bob Ooton
topcat@***.net
