Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: TopCat <topcat@***.NET>
Subject: Re: TopCat's Ascension to the Godhood. [WAY OT]
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:17:13 -0500
At 02:02 PM 7/18/97 -0400, you wrote:
>Your wrong, TC. Your oh so wrong.

I'm wrong in that I know my gaming views? Whatever...

>One side of your brain just isn't on the same wavelength as the one
>that post your messages. You proclaim one thing, then are vehmenently
>denying it the next. It's all starting to sound rather boring and trite.
>More rantings. You should read your own posts, before you object to
>something.

I've never proclaimed one thing and denied it (and certainly not in this
thread). In fact, if you want copies of my messages, I'll be more than
happy to forward them to you for re-reading. Would you like them?

>Smack me down? Mister, you haven't even come close. I'm so glad you
>speak for all assembeled, as you so intimately know what they thinking
>of your speeches. How very godlike of you.

Godlike? No, I haven't asked for money yet and I don't expect to do so
anytime soon. As far as knowing my own mind and reading what I write, I can
do that. Does this make me godlike?

As for smacking you down, you still haven't understood a word and continue
to make a bigger ass of yourself with each post. Perhaps I'm not the one
putting the smack-down on you, you are. Way to go, Vic. You impress me
more and more with every post.

>Talented writer, rather modest, aren't we? Guess we'll all not so
>gifted, eh?

I'm good and I know I'm good. Not everyone is so gifted, no. I can't draw
for shit though and many people can. If I wasn't good, I wouldn't say that
I was. Humbleness is for the untalented. I have rather humble drawing
skills. You understanding any of this, Vic?

>Using plain english is one thing. So does a parrot.

And yet you don't understand it... maybe you should buy a parrot, Vic.

>If you think you've 'won', fine. Knock your self out. Maybe you'll
>even believe it.

Of course I believe it, I won before your first rant appeared. You were
wrong about my views from the start and you've only snowballed since then.
Bravo!

>Maybe you should reread what I was trying to say, rather than
>injecting your own viewpoint over it.

I quoted everything you said in each reply. I read it carefully, in between
bursts of laughter and an occasional evil grin, and replied to it. My own
viewpoint is what you're so very far off on and you still haven't realized
that yet. WTG, Vic... you're another stat working to prove that the US
school system really doesn't work...

>Thanks to Mike, I can pretty much blow off your posts for what they
>are,.....

The truth? You've been blowing that off since the start... what's different
about that?
--
Bob Ooton
topcat@***.net

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.