Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Adam J <fro@***.AB.CA>
Subject: Re: [Admin] Long Range Game Design
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 14:07:46 -0600
At 12:57 7/18/97 -0500, you wrote:

>By the way, you ever follow through with the threat to unsubscribe anyone
>who continued the "Runner's Attitudes" thread in a threatening manner? If
>you did, you would've unsubscribed David Thompson for his post. I've got a
>copy of it and would, at the least, like to know that he got reprimanded for
>posting it. If nothing has been done, I'd like to know why?

* Adam whips his fingers off the keyboard and beings pointing around the
mailing list rapidly.

Nothing was done because the tone of the emails had shifted more towards
friendly. Also, I shouldn't have tacked [Admin] onto the runners post,
since it would have filtered to the top of someones mailbox, instead of in
with the thread. (If they sort by subject, which most people seem to do.)
Bad handling on my part in that case.

>Also, please direct such posts privately in the future as proper netiquette
>demands. Makes things so much happier for all of us and keeps me from
>getting irate and the poster from looking hypocritical...

Please, in the future, direct mail that has nothing to do with Shadowrun in
general, to the person who posted the comments you are replying too.
Most of your recent posts have nothing to interest the list in general, and
could easily go private.

Can we please end all this petty shit?
The list has a purpose, and this is not it.

-Adam
-
http://shadowrun.home.ml.org \ TSS Productions \ The Shadowrun Supplemental
ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader \ WildAngle@******** \ fro@***.ab.ca
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GO d-- s--:-- a--- C++++ UL+ P+ L+@ E? W-- N++ o? K- w O- M- V-- PS+
PE++ Y+ PGP- t+@ 5 X R+++>$ tv- b++(+++) DI+ D---- G++ e- h! r y-
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.