Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Bull <chaos@*****.COM>
Subject: Re: Totems
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 17:16:59 -0400
At 06:27 PM 7/18/97 +1000, Chris Maxfield wrote these timeless words:
>At 00:00 18/07/97 +1000, Glenn Munro wrote:
>>I have to disagree here. Hermetic mages study to learn their magic often
>>using mathematical formulas and the like. Those that even bother to try you
>>would expect to have average and above willpowers. Then with the shamanic
>>tradition why would a totem choose low willpowered individuals? The totem
> ^^^^^^^
>>wants to advance its own cause and would choose the best people for that
>>job and people with low willpower generally would not suit.
>
><grin> What?!?! Damn. I thought totems were just a convenient mental
>magical crutch for the shaman. No more real than any other hallucination.
></grin>
>
>Seriously though. Have the members of this list concluded that the totems
>are real - objectively and substantively real? This seems a bit too AD&Dish
>for me.
>
This REALLY gets into a wierd area, where you will get lots of varied
opinion, but yes, i think the list consensus is that Totems are real, i one
way or another. Now, go ask what a Totem is, and you'll get a dozen
different answers, but most will agree that Totems are real, in one way or
another.

In my personal game, they are very real, and very undefined...;]

Bull
--
Bull, aka Steven Ratkovich, aka Rak, aka a lot of others! :]

The Offical Celebrity Shadowrn Mailing List Welcome Ork Decker!
Fearless Leader of the Star Wars Mailing List
List Flunky of ShadowCreations, creators of the Newbies Guide,
in production now!
HOME PAGE: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Cavern/3604/home.html

"Gen Con, here I come!"
-- Me

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.