Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@****.ORG>
Subject: Re: Physical Adepts
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 11:38:12 -0600
Jonathan Hurley wrote:
|
| So I decided to do make buying a magic point worth of physical adept
| abilities 15 karma. Flat rate, no changes. (Umm, that's about two runs for
| my game, what with individual karma awards.) This does not change the
| physical adept's actual magic rating.
|
| If he wants to initiate, the cost for grade 0 is 18 (less if he takes an
| ordeal/does it with a group.) Each additional grade of initiation costs
| (6+(next grade)*3)-15.

Why the -15? For each grade of initiation he's getting some pretty
good metamagic abilities.

| A physical adept may only initiate to a level equal to the number of magic
| points worth of powers he has -6 (i.e., his initiate grade is limited by
| the amount of magic points he's bought.)

So if a physad that's purchased 2 extra points of physad abilities can only
initiate to grade 2 (just to clarify).

| I believe that this would make physical adepts a little more interesting
| and playable without overpowering them.

I like the idea of PAs being able to purchase more points to spend on
abilities, but I think you should keep the initiation rules is. If a
PA purchases extra points, and then later initiates, then he should
get the points gained for that too (a PA purchases 2 extra points for
30 karma, then initiates over time to grade 2 increasing his Magic by
2 and gets another 2 points to spend on PA abilities).

An easier way may be to allow Physads 1.5 PA Points per point of
Magic. And if a player makes a Priority A Physad, he gets 2 PA
Points per point of Magic (this one has never been tested, just an
idea that rolled out of my left ear).

-David
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm
--
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing
which ones to keep."

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.