Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: John Dukes <dukes@*******.NET>
Subject: Re: Chargen
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 18:20:26 -0500
><buzzer> Oh, I'm sorry, that's not the correct answer, but you've been a
>great contestant and we have some wonderful consolation prizes for you...
>
>Actually, that is _exactly_ what the official rules state. Under "Magical
>Talent", p33
>
> Only magically active characters with Magic Ratings of 1 or
>higher can purchase any of the Magical Talent Edges. . .
>
>This is contrary to the intentions of the writer (Steve Kenson), who
>intended that only a character who has not already selected Magic
>Priority could get _one_ of the Magical Talent Edges (so a character
>without any selected Magic Priority could get Astral Sight OR the ability
>to conjure watchers OR the ability to cast a _single_ spell OR etc, etc)
>

As I have said previously in this thread there is no such section in my copy
of the book. Perhaps I've somehow got ahold of an unedited copy. Does anyone
else have a copy with this text missing?


>On which point, Magical Talents or Natural Immunity? I just demonstrated
>Magical Talents, and if you'll read closely you'll see that Natural
>Immunity is only good against a _natural_ disease or toxin, so unless you
>can point out a passage where it states that Narcoject is a
>naturally-ocurring substance. . . You can have an immunity to hemlock, or
>nightshade, cyanide (it _does_ occur naturally, after all:) or against
>VITAS or the common cold, but not against any man-made poison or
>biowarfare agent, which is explicitly stated in the approriate text.
>

True enough, Narcoject isnt the best example (thats what I get for listing a
toxin off the top of my head).

At any rate, yes, the system can be abused.

John

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.