Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Simon T. Sailer" <Simon.Sailer@****.AC.AT>
Subject: Re: the uac dilemma (minor insect spirit spoilers!)
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 08:37:23 +0100
> Yeah, but A) you're number crunching, which isn;t always a good things,
> and B) If a Sammy DOESN'T put most of his Attribute points into Body,
> Quickenss and Intelligence, he's lunch meat in a pgysical fight.
>
> Sammies are not designed to take out mages, they're designed to deal with
> mudnae threats...

Imho, they are designed to fight. To fight whichever opposition,
magical, spirits, mundanes, vehicles, critters, whatever.

> The teams Wizard is there to deal with magical threats...
>
> Rarely will you find a Sammy with a starting WP of more than 3, if that.
> It's not really part of the character type.

different games, different characters, but as I see the sammi, all of
the attributes are part of the character type. Sammies are in
extremely good physical and psychical shape... and are a bit weak
with the skills. with other characters, it's the other way round.
"strong, stupid samurai" and "intelligent, weak decker" is totally
against the way I see shadowrun. Sr has the most flexible character
generation system I know.


> Of course, this isn't true for EVERY sammy, but... How many 6's can you
> have in a character, unless you're talking a high level character, in which
> case it's a whole different ballgame anyways, and he should be fighting
> something bigger than a force 4 bug spirit :]

*Grin* of course you can't have too many attributes at level 6 at the
beginning, but willpower and body have first priority as far as I am
concerned. The cyber and bioware will take care of the other
attributes.

> Bull

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.