Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: John E Pederson <lobo1@****.COM>
Subject: Re: Skill Levels
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 21:28:06 EDT
On Thu, 24 Jul 1997 12:18:34 -0400 "Steven A. Collins"
<scollins@**.UML.EDU> writes:
<< The problem is if you consider a skill of 6 in unarmed combat to be
equivilant to a black belt in some martial art and 9 to be on the
level of Kwai Chang Cain from the Tv series Kung Fu then it would only
take a normal person about 10 years to reach that level of skill and a
Shadowrunner about 2 to 3 years. I think a skill of 8 should be a
black belt and 15 should be where a true master of the martial art
should be.>>

The problem with your presumption is that it will take them about 10
years if that's *all* they do in that ten years. If they don't 'spend'
any karma improving other skills, getting new ones, etc. And since a lot
of the choice on where to put your karma would happen on a sub-concious
level, by the time such a person gets done, they'd have learned Unarmed
Combat (Kung Fu) (specialization whatever) of 5/8/10, Etiquette (Martial
Artists) 4, etc, etc. You'd probably have 3-4 new skills in the process,
as well as improving others. And you'll have improved your physical
attributes, too. The truth is that this is a _game_. The fact that things
don't always seem to stack up, doesn't necessarily matter (unless having
a perfect representation of reality is your goal, in which case, you're
playing the wrong game;). Initiates are rather rare, too (I/we estimated
that there about 3800 in Seattle a while back) but they get tossed around
like nobody's business:) Let's face it: average people get more than 5
Karma a year, they just don't *use* all of it on useful stuff.


--
-Canthros
I had rather believe all the fables in the legends and the Talmud
and the Alcoran, than that this universal frame is without a mind.
--Francis Bacon
http://members.aol.com/canthros1

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.