Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jonathan Hurley <jhurley1@************.EDU>
Subject: Re: the uac dilemma (minor insect spirit spoilers!)
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 15:46:47 -0400
On Friday, July 25, 1997 15:27, Justin Pinnow[SMTP:vanyel@*******.NET]
wrote:
> > From: Jonathan Hurley <jhurley1@************.EDU>

> > No kidding. But my point is that all of the recoil has been canceled,
by
> > stuff that only cancels recoil. Those other modifiers apply to ranged
> > combat whether or not you're firing 1 bullet or 10.
>
> Okay. The point I am trying to make is that you got the TN down to a 6
> before any of these other modifiers were applied. The point you made
about
> it being easy to hit in such a case just isn't true. That's why I
brought
> up the other modifiers, and they didn't even include cover mods. You
will
> be looking at TNs from 8-16 after all these mods are applied...that's not
> easy to do.

I got the target number down to a 2! before other modifiers applied. (Ares
alpha has 2 points inherent recoil comp & can take barrel-mount
accessories, thus a IGV4 can be added. Add a shock pad and 7 strength to
completely negate the recoil, and a smartgun brings the TN to a 2.)

Now, admittedly, this is an extreme case (not too many weapon/accessory
combos can apply 7 points of recoil comp before strength) but with IGV4,
shock pads, and strength mods running around, even 6round aimed bursts are
possible without too much effort.

But that's not the point. Bugs are faster, and clean up in HtH. Charge the
guy. Sure he drops one, maybe two, before the bugs get there, but then he's
hosed.

--
Quicksilver rides again
--------------
Those who would give up a little freedom for security
deserve neither freedom nor security
-Benjamin Franklin
Yeah, I have Attention Deficit Dis - Hey, look at that butterfly!
Jonathan Hurley (mailto:jhurley1@************.edu)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.