Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Adam J <fro@***.AB.CA>
Subject: Re: My New Campaign
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 01:11:32 -0600
At 20:55 7/28/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Hey all, I need some input :)

...

>I usually dole out the merits and flaws in their bg with out points
>or benefits)so are there any ideas on how to restrict the system to keep
>them from making a real kick-ass janitor?

If you like using the points based system, then I would suggest using it,
but with less than the starting 100 points. 75 sounds about right,
depending on the age of the character..
I would also likely limit skills to level 4, and require heavy
justification for any cyberware a person may have. The secretary may have
a datajack, but why does the plumber have a hand spur? You could also
limit starting cash to 200K.. I limited it to 400K in my new game -- ended
up with some characters with higher skills and attributes, but most still
had a large amount of 'stuff', too.
Another thing, if these people have proper employment, they should also
need to have a permanent address, which would mean a few months of any
lifestyle pre-paid..or even a medium lifestyle or up. "We don't hire people
who live in rooms smaller than my bathroom!"

If I didn't feel like such crap I would play with the points system and do
some characters like that up.. ah well, there is tommorrow, I suppose.. :)

-Adam
http://shadowrun.home.ml.org \ TSS Productions \ The Shadowrun Supplemental
ShadowRN Assistant Fearless Leader \ WildAngle@******** \ fro@***.ab.ca
-
GC3.1 GO d-- s--:-- a--- C++++ UL+ P+ L+@ E? W-- N++ o? K- w O- M- V-- PS+
PE++ Y+ PGP- t+@ 5 X R+++>$ tv- b++(+++) DI+ D---- G++ e- h! r y-

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.