Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Loki <daddyjim@**********.COM>
Subject: Re: Full of Life
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 16:52:56 -0700
---"J. Keith Henry" wrote:
>
> > On astral security: Having astrally active security is also more
> consistent,
> > IMHO. If you have dual-natured ivy protecting your building, the
GM can
> > treat
> > it just like a Ward: assign it a Rating and away you go. Unlike
the
> dormant,
> > immovable ivy of SR2, this barrier can be killed in astral
combat, but it
> > will fight back like any other barrier.
> >
> I had to enter into this one. You can't engage the "ivy" in Astral
Combat,
> as the living signature isn't "active" on the astral level. Yeah,
this is
> part of that Metaphysical Hairsplitting that was mentioned in the
part I
> snipped (sorry), but there is a BIG difference between active astral
presence
> and passive astral presence. If you start doing the "dual nature"
options
> for living beings, then Astral Combat becomes INCREDIBLY dangerous.

In his example, Steve's referring to having a special breed of
awakened ivy that was grown and bred to be dual natured for astral
security. He's not referring to making all living beings dual natured
or astrally present.

===
@>--,--'--- Loki <gamemstr@********.com>

Poisoned Elves: www.primenet.com/~gamemstr/

"You're being held up by a stim patch, Loki's almost a pile of ashes
thanks to that fire elemental, and we've got the Baron running around
screaming assassins...assassins...oh eek, assassins!"
--> Caric to Ook during the Harlequin Campaign
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.