Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: David Buehrer <dbuehrer@******.CARL.ORG>
Subject: Re: At a LOS
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 09:45:22 -0700
Lehlan Decker wrote:
/
/ On Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 08:46:21AM -0700, David Buehrer wrote:
/ >
/ > If someone jumped between the mage and his target I would rule that
/ > it would either break the mages LOS (he couldn't see the target so he
/ > couldn't cast the spell) or cover modifiers would be applied to the
/ > mage's target number. Because the mage does sync the spell with his
/ > target, and if he can't see the target he can't sync the spell (can't
/ > cast the spell).
/ >
/ Hmm...ok..I believe I follow that. (Need to wait until I get to the
/ house to dig up the part about mirrors but...)
/ Could this only happen with a delayed action? Or is there another
/ way I'm forgetting to get in front of the mage?

There are two ways: initative ties and delayed actions. If a mage
and a sam tied their initiative but the sam had the higher initiative
(sam goes on 20 then 10, the mage goes on 10) the mage would declare
his actions first, then the sam would declare. The sam would then
act before the mage. If the mage were to declare that he was casting
at spell and if the sam were aware of this (don't ask me how, this is
just an example) the sam could declare that he was moving to block
the mage's LOS.

Example 2: Sam rolls an initative of 13, mage rolls a 10. The sam
delays his action. On 10 the mage declares he's targeting one of the
sam's friends with a spell. The sam is aware of this (again, it's an
example) and declares that he's going to move to block the mage's
LOS.

-David
--
"Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes.
Art is knowing which ones to keep."
--
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.