Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Adam Treloar <guardian@*******.DIALIX.COM.AU>
Subject: Re: New Physad Metamagic Power
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 17:05:54 +1100
On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Jonathan Hurley wrote:

> This reminded me of the power I just wrote up for a physad in my campaign:
> Weapon merge.
>
> Weapon Merge: Cost:0.5 Effects: The physical adept with this power has the
> ability to 'project' a limited part of his awareness into a weapon he is
> holding - melee or ranged. It takes a simple action for the adept to merge
> with the weapon. Once merged, he is more aware of the weapon, giving him a
> -2 bonus to any tests taken with the weapon. There is a significant
> disadvantage, however; any actions taken that do not directly involve the
> use of the weapon are at a +2 penalty. Furthermore, it takes a simple
> action to unmerge from the weapon safely.

Not too bad... Except I'd maybe change it to -1/+1, or negation of one
penalty (eg visibility, wounds etc) against +2 or +3. Otherwise sounds
pretty reasonable.

> If the weapon that the physical
> adept is merged with loses contact with the physical adept's aura, the
> physical adept must resist 4L Stun damage with Willpower if it is a weapon
> the adept intended to throw or drop, or 6M if the loss of contact was
> unintentional.

Doesn't sound too bad.

> If the weapon takes damage, the physical adept must resist
> stun damage with willpower, against a damage code determined by the
> gamemaster, based on the amount of damage taken by the weapon. (If a sword
> is chipped by hitting a metal-laced bone, it might be Light damage, while a
> baseball bat splintering over a troll's cyberskull would be Deadly). While
> merged, the weapon is treated as being included in the physical adept's
> aura for spell-targeting purposes (i.e. the physical adept's aura
> 'surrounds' the weapon while the physical adept is merged with it.)

It's a good idea, but how many of us use weapon damage rules of any kind?
Except where acid-based spells and effects are concerned, of course.

Guardian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Any sufficiently advanced magic is indestinguishable from technology.
So there."
Adam Treloar aka Guardian
s777317@*****.student.gu.edu.au http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1900/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.